Why Object oriented programming is a disaster?

It’s important to note that the statement “OOPs is a disaster” is not a universally accepted truth. In fact, many developers and organizations have found object-oriented programming (OOP) to be a useful and effective programming paradigm.

That being said, it’s also true that OOP is not a perfect programming paradigm, and like any approach to programming, it has its limitations and potential drawbacks. Here are a few reasons why some people might consider OOP to be a “disaster”:

1. Complexity: OOP can be more complex than other programming paradigms, particularly for beginners. This can make it more difficult to learn and understand, which can be a drawback for those who are new to programming.

2. Overuse of inheritance: Some people argue that OOP encourages the overuse of inheritance, which can lead to convoluted and inflexible codebases. In these cases, OOP can make it more difficult to understand and maintain code, which can be a major drawback.

3. Performance issues: Some studies have found that OOP can lead to slower performance compared to other programming paradigms, particularly in certain types of applications. This can be a concern for developers who are building applications that need to perform at a high level.

4. Poor design: Some people argue that OOP can lead to poor design if it’s not used correctly, which can make it more difficult to maintain and update code over time. This can be a major drawback for developers who are working on long-term projects.

Overall, it’s important to consider the pros and cons of any programming paradigm before deciding which one to use. While OOP can be a useful and effective approach in some situations, it’s not the right choice for every project. It’s important to choose the right paradigm for your specific needs and goals.